Getty ImagesResearchers investigating new and persistently detectable viral load in four people with a previous history of suppressive ART report that this is caused by clonal expansion of reservoir cells. All cases included people having excellent adherence and no evidence of drug resistance. [1]
The paper also reports new findings that links the cause of viraemia to clones carrying proviruses with 5’-Leader defects.
These cases had many years on suppressive ART and became a clinical challenge due to a subsequent unexplained extended period of detectable viral load that was unresponsive to treatment changes.
Viral load increased to levels where guidelines currently recommend changing treatment,
The four participants (P1–4) had been living with HIV for more than 15 years (range 15-32 years) and had been undetectable on long-term ART from 7 to 27 years, with good CD4 counts. Treatment changes, including intensification had not been successful.
The results have important implications for clinical management of viral rebound that are not currently covered in HIV treatment guidelines that recommend modifying ART in an attempt to resuppress viral load.
As well as not being effective, this risk undermining the relationship of trust between people living with HIV and their doctor, if the default assumption is that this is caused by poor adherence.
The study was published as an online open access paper in the Journal of Clinical Investigation in January.
Similar cases presented at CROI 2019 were restricted to levels of viraemia that were between 50 to 200 copies/mL when treatment changes would not necessarily have been recommended. [2, 3, 4]
This paper is notable for including higher levels of viraemia >1000 copies/mL when treatment is definitely recommended to be changed.
Low level viral load (>50–1000 copies/mL) is a cause of significant stress and anxiety to people living with HIV who expect their viral load to be undetectable (<50 copies/mL) for both their own health and as protection for their partners.
This highlights the need for an easy test to identify the source of rebound viral load.
Without this test, it might be possible to use lack of impact from ART intensification as a way to return to previous ART, without continued worry about low level viraemia.
This is clearly an area that needs further research.
By Simon Collins, HIV i-Base
Reference
Source : HIV i-Base
Are you living with HIV/AIDS? Are you part of a community affected by HIV/AIDS and co-infections? Do you work or volunteer in the field? Are you motivated by our cause and interested to support our work?
Stay in the loop and get all the important EATG updates in your inbox with the EATG newsletter. The HIV & co-infections bulletin is your source of handpicked news from the field arriving regularly to your inbox.