A two-year study comparing two forms of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)—long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) and oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF)—found small but significant differences in bone mineral density (BMD) impact. The findings in this relatively young cohort provide a golden opportunity for us to revisit what we know about BMD in the context of PrEP, and how we can best approach conversations with our patients about their PrEP options.
This publication analyzed bone mineral density data from HPTN 083, a randomized, placebo-controlled study comparing CAB-LA and FTC/TDF among a racially diverse population of cisgender men and transgender women with a median age under 30.
Bone density was measured via DXA scans at three anatomic sites (lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip). The manuscript examines data through 105 weeks of follow-up.
From baseline through 105 weeks:
TDF/FTC was associated with small BMD losses at all anatomic sites: The mean change was -0.8% in lumbar spine, -1.0% in femoral neck, and -0.6% in total hip.
CAB-LA was associated with modest BMD gains at all sites: The mean change was +1.7% in lumbar spine, +0.5% in femoral neck, and +0.8% in total hip.
The differences between the two groups were statistically significant for lumbar spine and total hip, but narrowly missed significance for femoral neck.
TDF/FTC users were more likely than CAB-LA users to lose >5% BMD (24.6% vs 15.2%).
Source : TheBodyPro
Are you living with HIV/AIDS? Are you part of a community affected by HIV/AIDS and co-infections? Do you work or volunteer in the field? Are you motivated by our cause and interested to support our work?
Stay in the loop and get all the important EATG updates in your inbox with the EATG newsletter. The HIV & co-infections bulletin is your source of handpicked news from the field arriving regularly to your inbox.