Is antiretroviral therapy (ART) just as good with two drugs as it is with three? Newly published data from a well-constructed study give us the strongest evidence to date that, when it comes to the combination of dolutegravir and lamivudine, the answer is a ringing “Yes”—albeit with important caveats about exclusionary criteria.
DOLCE was a Phase 4, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority study that enrolled ART-naïve adults (age >18 years) with HIV from Argentina and Brazil. Enrolled participants had an HIV RNA > 1,000 copies/mL and CD4 cell counts < 200 cells/mm3.
There was a hefty exclusion list for this study, including people: who were pregnant or breastfeeding; who had hepatitis B virus coinfection; who had an active opportunistic infection; who had liver or renal insufficiency; or who harbored major viral resistance mutations to dolutegravir (DTG), lamivudine (3TC), or tenofovir (TDF).
In total, 230 eligible individuals were randomized 2:1 to receive DTG/3TC or DTG+TDF/XTC. (“XTC” is the commonly used abbreviation for “either 3TC or FTC”; FTC is short for the 3TC prodrug emtricitabine.) The two groups were similar in demographic characteristics:
~73% were male, 25% female, 2% transgender
Median CD4 count = 116 cells/mm³
43% had CD4 ≤100, and 33% had CDC stage C diagnoses.T
Median baseline viral load: 151,000 copies/mL (IQR: 49,027.5–446,947)
61% >100,000 copies/mL; 23% ≥500,000 c/mL; 10% ≥1,000,000 c/mL
HIV subtype B present in 63%
The study primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48 (FDA Snapshot, ITT-E). Secondary endpoints included CD4 recovery, resistance in failures, and safety/tolerability.
Virologic suppression:
82% in DTG/3TC arm versus 81% in DTG+TDF/XTC arm. The adjusted difference was +2.0% (95% CI −8.7 to +12.8).
Among people with high baseline VL (>100,000 copies/mL), the rate was 81% in the DTG/3TC arm versus 77% in the DTG+TDF/XTC arm.
CD4 recovery:
Median +200 cells/mm³ on DTG/3TC versus +177 cells/mm³ on DTG+TDF/XTC.
Adverse events:
Overall and serious adverse event frequency (including IRIS events) were similar in both groups.
No emergent INSTI or NRTI resistance among virologic failures with sequences available.
Source : TheBodyPro
Are you living with HIV/AIDS? Are you part of a community affected by HIV/AIDS and co-infections? Do you work or volunteer in the field? Are you motivated by our cause and interested to support our work?
Stay in the loop and get all the important EATG updates in your inbox with the EATG newsletter. The HIV & co-infections bulletin is your source of handpicked news from the field arriving regularly to your inbox.