Place Raymond Blyckaerts, 13
B-1050 Brussels, Belgium

Opening hours:
Mon to Thu: 10h - 12h30 and 13h30 - 17h
Fri: 10h - 12h30 and 13h30 - 16h


+3226269640
Google maps


Find us on
Google Maps
To subscribe to our newsletter, please click here. If you would like to become an EATG member, please fill in the form here You can also subscribe to our RSS feed by clicking here.
You can also follow us on one of these media :
21/06/2012
Lipid, fat benefits in switch from other protease inhibitors to ATV/r

People who switched to atazanavir/ritonavir lost less limb fat and had a sharp reduction in lipids compared with the PI/r group.

Switching from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) to atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) did not improve abdominal fat in a 96-week randomized trial. But people who switched to atazanavir/ritonavir lost less limb fat and had a sharp reduction in lipids compared with the PI/r group.


Atazanavir has gained popularity as a first- and second-line PI because of its generally mild effect on lipids associated with cardiovascular risk. Its effect on body fat abnormalities compared with other ritonavir-boosted PIs is less well understood.


This multicenter, open-label trial randomized 201 patients with a viral load below 50 copies/mL while taking another PI/r to maintain that PI/r or to switch to atazanavir/ritonavir. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors were unchanged during the trial. Researchers measured body fat changes with DEXA scans and abdominal CT scans.


While 131 people switched to atazanavir/ritonavir, 70 continued their current PI/r. Similar proportions switching to atazanavir/ritonavir (93%) and maintaining their current PI (89%) kept their viral load below 50 copies/mL through 96 weeks.


Average changes in trunk-to-limb fat ratio were similar in the two treatment arms, but more people who maintained their original PI/r had a 20% or greater decrease in limb fat through 96 weeks. Compared with people who maintained their initial PI/r, those who switched to atazanavir/ritonavir had significantly greater reductions in lipids associated with atherogenesis.


Both regimens were well tolerated. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 clinical adverse events was higher among people who switched to atazanavir/ritonavir (34%) than among those who stayed with their initial PI/r (4%). That finding is not surprising since study participants had already demonstrated tolerance of their PI/r by the time they entered the trial.


By Mark Mascolini



Source: Graeme J Moyle, Jaime Andrade-Villanueva, Pierre-Marie Girard, Andrea Antinori, Patricia Salvato, Johannes R Bogner, Phillip Hay, Jesús Santos, Ludovic Astier, Miranda Pans, Agnes Balogh, Sophie Biguenet, the ReAL Study Team. A randomized comparative 96-week trial of boosted atazanavir versus continued boosted protease inhibitor in HIV-1 patients with abdominal adiposity. Antiviral Therapy. 2012; 17: 689-700.


For the study abstract


(Downloading the complete article requires a subscription to Antiviral Therapy or an online payment; the abstract is free.)




Source: IAS